On Sunday 20 July 2003 06:03, Abel Cheung wrote: > Andi Payn wrote: > | I even tried building some autoconf scripts from scratch following the > | recommendations, and they don't find either guile-gtk. (For example, > | guile-gtk.h is placed in /usr/include/libguile-gtk-1.2_0/guile-gtk.h, but > | guile-config doesn't list that directory, so the file is never found.) > > Is the /libguile-gtk-1.2_0/ subdir invented by packager?
I'm not sure. I do know that the only file in that directory is guile-gtk.h, however. > | The exact same problems turn up with gtkextra. > > You mean building gtk2 port of gtkextra? I had it packaged (not > submitted because no package need it so far) but it doesn't need guile > at all. No, sorry; nothing to do with guile here. I meant that (just as with guile), there is no package for the gtk2 port of gtkextra. If you have an up-to-date package, please upload it. (If you're concerned that no package needs it, well, now we have one: gnubg.) Or I can package it, if you don't want to bother. > | If you link /usr/include/libguile-gtk-1.2_0/guile-gtk.h into /usr/include, > | that allows guile to be used in gnubg. Should the package > | (libguile-gtk-1.2_0-devel) include this link, or is there a better way to > | accomplish this? > > Better patch guile-config to include the aforementioned include dir. On the other hand, if we get the gtk2 port of guile-gtk, then the only package I've seen for which this is a problem will use that instead, so there's really no need to change anything. Thanks.
