17. Aug 2003 13:53, Buchan Milne wrote: > On Sun, 17 Aug 2003, stronne wrote: > > Sun 17. Elokuuta 2003 00:55, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 19:15, stronne wrote: > > > > I tried to install module-init-tools-0.9.13-1bor.src.rpm > > > > with # rpm --rebuild > > > > It said it needs /usr/lib/libc.a > > > > Anybody any idea where I could find that? > > > > > > glibc-static-devel . > > > > Thank You, that it was and now I could > > install module-init-tools too. > > And see if it makes any difrence about > > 2.6 modules :) > > BTW, in future, instead of asking the list a question, ask urpmf the same > question, and you will get an answer much faster: > > $ urpmf /usr/lib/libc.a$ > glibc-static-devel:/usr/lib/libc.a > Thank you :) I actually shouldn't be at this list in the first place. I belong to newbie with my silly questions :)
> (should module-init-tools not BuildRequire glibc-static-devel ?) > At least for me it didn't build, it required that libc.a which turn out to be glibc-static-devel :) After that it build otherwise well but complained about missing group bor and said using root instead. But installing module-init-tools-0.9.13-1bor.src.rpm didn't help. Kernel-2.6 still doesn't load modules I need. I have generated modprobe.conf in /etc and I have aliases there but no help. Greetings Stronne
