François Pons wrote: > Liam Quin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'd like it to prompt > > yes/always/No/reject all > > I can't do that for 9.2, but I can make yes act as always and no act as reject > all. > > It could be fixed more cleanly after 9.2
Call me overcautious, but I'd prefer not to have that kind of fix. I think that the --no-verify-rpm switch would be a better workaround because it's explicit. The implied "always" only for urpmi (and not for other utilities) would be confusing, especially if users have to relearn the effect of "yes" and "no" in the next release. - John
