--- Götz Waschk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Montag, 15. September 2003, 05:05:01 Uhr MET, schrieb Ric > Johnson: > > Are you sure about that? That does not make any sense to me > > considering the large number of non-essiential programs that > > could have been removed and that mozilla is the default MDK > web > > browser since they dropped Netscape. > > AFAIK all packages have a score that marks it importance. Devel > packages generally have a lower score than application > packages. Most > Joe Users don't build mozilla extensions but would be sad about > a missing kde screensaver or one game less on the download > edition's CDs. > --
:) Well, if "Joe Users" are paying for it, I suppose that is the way it should be. Problem is that "Joe" wants the latest browser widget too - maybe the latest Galeon - and expects somebody will build it for them. That "somebody" is the guy that expects mozilla-devel to be readily available... It seems like there should be a better solution than to cut mozilla-devel from the download release since it is absolutely essential for building any of the gecko based applications. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
