Oh oh oh... a little panic from van der Eijk again...
I'm starting to feel guilty...

> > > rpm -Uvh gnome-libs-1.2.1-2mdk.alpha.rpm
> > > error: failed dependencies:
> > >         libart_lgpl.so.2 is needed by ee-0.3.11-5mdk
> > >         libart_lgpl.so.2 is needed by libglade-0.13-1mdk
> > >         libart_lgpl.so.2 is needed by gnome-media-1.0.51-3mdk
> > >         libart_lgpl.so.2 is needed by gnome-linuxconf-0.23-2mdk
> > >         libart_lgpl.so.2 is needed by gtop-1.0.7-0.4mdk
> > >         libart_lgpl.so.2 is needed by gnomba-0.6.2-4mdk

> Perform a "rpm -q{p}i --provides" on both gnome-libs 1mdk and 2mdk

> You'll see that the 1mdk does provide libart_lgpl whereas 2mdk won't
> probably provide it (even if the file list contains this file!)
It's even worse...

glibc
x86                             alpha
glibc-localedata                glibc-localedata
ANSI_X3.110.so                  ld.so.2
ARMSCII-8.so
ASMO_449.so
BIG5.so
CP1250.so
CP1251.so
CP1252.so
CP1253.so
CP1254.so
CP1255.so
CP1256.so
CP1257.so
CP1258.so
CP737.so
CP775.so
CSN_369103.so
CWI.so
DEC-MCS.so
EBCDIC-AT-DE-A.so
EBCDIC-AT-DE.so
EBCDIC-CA-FR.so
EBCDIC-DK-NO-A.so
EBCDIC-DK-NO.so
EBCDIC-ES-A.so
EBCDIC-ES-S.so
EBCDIC-ES.so
EBCDIC-FI-SE-A.so
EBCDIC-FI-SE.so
EBCDIC-FR.so
EBCDIC-IS-FRISS.so
EBCDIC-IT.so
EBCDIC-PT.so
EBCDIC-UK.so
EBCDIC-US.so
ECMA-CYRILLIC.so
EUC-CN.so
EUC-JP.so
EUC-KR.so
...
..
.
and the list goes on...

Something went very wrong on my alpha... the Glibc package it produces
doesn't provide much... hmmm....

> This is due to problems while building the new RPM. Try to monitor the
> rebuild of the new RPM and see why the "find provides" probably fails to
> complete gracefully..

Small bit from the glibc buildoutput:

Failed to find Provides:
Provides: glibc-localedata ld.so.2
PreReq: /sbin/ldconfig
Obsoletes: zoneinfo libc-static libc-devel libc-profile libc-headers
linuxthreads gencat locale glibc-localedata
Processing files: glibc-devel-2.1.3-7mdk
Finding  Provides: (using /usr/lib/rpm/find-provides)...
line 532: Dependency tokens must begin with alpha-numeric, '_' or '/': -
first build for 2.0.96

See... I'm feeling _so_ guilty... all of the packages on my alpha have
this
problem... Now, I'm really wondering WTF caused this...

greetz,

Stefan

Reply via email to