on 13. oct 2003 on 07:53, Giuseppe Ghib? wrote: > Tibor Pittich ha scritto: > > >today, i instaled postfix with amavis-new, spamassassin and clamav > >support. postfix have number 80 as starting reference, same as > >spamassassin and clamav. amavis-new have 79. > >imho, it will be more clean if all mail preprocessors are started before > >starting mta and optionally before amavis. > > > >what are you think about this? > > IMHO it is right to have amavisd-new started before postfix, because > postfix will open later it opens content filters scanners pipes, AFAIK.
yes, you are right, but amavis-new is ok in this case. i talking about other utils which amavis-new uses (spamassassin, clamav, etc.) which are currently started after amavis-new. imho, if more services started in runlevel with same starting reference, these services started in alphabetical order, e.g. spamassassin is started after postfix or sendmail. -- member of Advanced InternetWorks group -> http://www.ainetworks.sk professional home page -> http://tibor.pittich.sk personal home page -> http://c0re.phuture.sk
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
