Oh and one more thing 2.2 alpha1 seems to have fixed this problem from what
I can see in hte ./configure but I 've not got the time to actually compile
and test.
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 10:50:08PM +0800, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> Yo,
>
>
> [...]
>
> > [2000/11/26 14:56:42, 0] lib/util_sec.c:assert_gid(72)
> > Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,702) now set to (0,0) uid=(0,0)
> > [2000/11/26 14:56:42, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(2381)
> > PANIC: failed to set gid
> >
> > [2000/11/26 15:10:45, 0] lib/util_sec.c:assert_gid(72)
> > Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,702) now set to (0,0) uid=(0,0)
> > [2000/11/26 15:10:45, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(2381)
> > PANIC: failed to set gid
> >
> > I have been using user-built samba's for a long time, and now since
> > glibc-2.2 this is going on....
> >
> > Take a look at this diff between the buildout of the samba package built
> > as root and as user (the "cooker" user in this case). Do you see that
> > the "checking for setreuid..." test with the "cooker" user yields the
> > same error as stated above? What do you make out of it?
> >
>
>
> Glibc is said to be binary compatible, at least ... well anyway, samba 2.2 alpha1
> is out, you can download it from ftp://ftp.samba.org and I wonder how well it
> works as far as fixing this problem goes.
>
> Also if you set your debug level higher it might reveal something about why it's
> not working. Usually a debug level of 10 will do, but anything higher than 3 is
> extremely cryptic , maybe I cannot read it...
>
>
> --
> Geoffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 李長風
>
> ~/.signature 中文big5 compliant (You can't see it thanks to new glibc. :p)
>
> http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~snailtalk
> ftp://devel.mandrakesoft.com/pub/people/snailtalk
>
> "Seven days in a honeymoon makes one whole week."
--
Geoffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
李長風
~/.signature 中文big5 compliant (You can't see it thanks to new glibc. :p)
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~snailtalk
ftp://devel.mandrakesoft.com/pub/people/snailtalk
"Seven days in a honeymoon makes one whole week."
