on 11/27/00 3:14 PM, Vincent Danen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> what Ron mistakenly called the "real 7.2" and is in
> fact 7.2 (what you have)

Well, considering there are at least *3* versions out there, as of last
count, all labeled '7.2' and all different, I think refering to something as
7.2 is no longer a clear identifier. Seriously, based on this experience, I
think a better versioning or identifying scheme needs to be come up with.

Harry


Reply via email to