[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Walluck) writes:
> On 16 Dec 2000, dam's wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guillaume Cottenceau) writes:
> >
> > > David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > Hi. I just downloaded the BitchX-1.0-0.c17.1mdk SRPM. BitchX license is
> > > > listed as GPL. It's not GPL, it's BSD-Style. I also think that the
> > >
> > > Okay. Damien?
> >
> > yep.
> >
>
> rpmlint allows for BSD and BSD-style. I still think plain BSD is
> inaccurate. Some files have different licenses, but the main code, has the
> original 3 clause BSD license and thensome accoring to the
> documentation. That's why I think BSD-style is more accurate, but maybe
> there isn't any real difference.
corrected. I didn't look in the right rpmlint source version. thanx
--
dam's
