RE: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

[Mike & Tracy Holt]

> > > yes...cooker is rather useless if it cannot be installed for
> testing...hope
> > > this one is a priority item...
> >
> > Actually, some internal changes are processed currently, you
> can count the
> > merge of customized and expert modes with creation of
> "advanced" versions
> > of many single items and kernel-2.4 ; so priority currently is not heavy
> > testing but, let's say, "developping"..
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
> >
> >
> If this is the case (that installing is a good way to remove
> windows) wouldn't it be advisable to say something like this in
> the installation-program. Something like don't do this, it can't
> be done, use instead 7.2 and upgrade that to full cooker status


Well that would also be a problem since 7.2 and cooker are incompatible.