Prana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In my earlier e-mail, I asked a question if anybody wants me to make the > non-gui version of MandrakeUpdate. I am quite committed to do it if it's > wanted. However, I haven't had a response about this, does it mean that > it's not wanted? What exactly is needed? If it's something like keep everything uptodate, - my first solution was to say, mirror the dir and rpm -Fvh * but someone told that it was bothersome to download the unneeded packages. - my second solution was to do exactly what MandrakeUpdate is doing, just simpler (aka assuming one wants to update everything). These 2 are so simple that i can't see what needs to be done!
- [Cooker] About the text-based version of MandrakeUpdate Prana
- Re: [Cooker] About the text-based version of Mandrak... David Relson
- Re: [Cooker] About the text-based version of Mandrak... Vin Shelton
- Re: [Cooker] About the text-based version of Mandrak... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] About the text-based version of Man... David Relson
- Re: [Cooker] About the text-based version of Man... Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] About the text-based version of... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] About the text-based versio... Michael Brown
- Re: [Cooker] About the text-based versio... David Relson
- Re: [Cooker] About the text-based v... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] About the text-bas... David Relson
- Re: [Cooker] About the text-based version of Man... Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] About the text-based version of Mandrak... Brendan/Coolian