We're on the same wavelength here, maybe I should have used the word
irony instead of sarcasm, but related to the point of ending "up with
thousands of such lists that would bring us
> to square one".
Thanks for responding, I was glad to have someone respond.
Randy Kramer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry. No sarcasm intended here. What I mean is that with this suggestion
> that we have lists of packages that different people would like to use ( a
> Linus Torvalds list being a list of programs that Linus would like to have on
> his machine) we may end up with thousands of such lists that would bring us
> to square one. Remember, the problem we are trying to solve is the number of
> programs to choose from and the unnecessary duplication of function
> introduced by installing many programs doing the same thing.
>
> Michel.
