On Sunday 20 May 2001 17:37, you wrote: > So sprach andre am Sun, May 20, 2001 at 11:05:05PM -0400: > > Almost all softmodems are "supported" under linux. You just have to run > > an old kernel so seeing if it is linux supported is not sufficiant > > ? Why are old kernels better in supporting winmodems than new ones? And, > how old is old enough? 2.0? > > Alexander Skwar I have an Intel modem in a shoe-box(came with the pc) and the drivers for that one are for 2.2.17ish. Not 2.4. and what i understand it doesn't work with it
- [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Mohamed L'Hédi ZAHER
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Geoffrey Lee
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Tom Massey
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Robert L Martin
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Gary Lawrence Murphy
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Charles A. Shirley
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? andre
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Tom Massey
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? andre
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Terrible Tom
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Gary Lawrence Murphy
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Robert L Martin