On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Giuseppe Ghibo' wrote:
> That's not true. We've plenty of scientific applications and we pay
> attention to them. For instance we have also R in the main distrib, as
> well as OpenDX, etc.; we were also evaluating about scilab 2.6 for main (but
> the license it's not much clear so it's still 2.5 for now in contrib). grace
> is another example of scientific applications (now don't send me the
> kachinatech list... ;-)), and mupad is in the Application CDs of the powerpack.
>
> Regarding octave 2.0.17 is the latest stable version. 2.1.x are "development"
>version.
> So the problem is not the oldness of octave 2.0.X, but the oldness of the
> development 2.1.X version which was not turned yet in stable "release"
Thanks for pointing out this to me :)
Abel
