> > > > > time df lost > > > 3:10 310 + 32 ext2 > > > 3:35 304 + 34 reiser notail > > > 3:50 313 + 4 xfs > > > 4:00 267 + 35 reiser > > > 4:05 325 + 8 jfs > > > 4:05 310 + 64 ext3 > > > > > So jfs and xfs lose the least space? Or do they lose space in an other > > way > > it's quite hard to determine this with so little data. > > - a thing for sure is that reiserfs (without notail) is very nice for least > space. > - jfs seems to be have a steeper slope > - ext3 has the worse initial cost (but it can be tuned i think) > I think it will still be quite hard to determine even if you have a lot more data. That's why it is B. favorite flame subject ps Does anybody know how i can "repair" this behaviour. It's a reiserfs partition which was recovered from some fdisk misfortune [root@node1583e andre]# ls -l .gnome_private/panel.d/default ls: .gnome_private/panel.d/default: Permission denied
