[EMAIL PROTECTED] (andre) writes: > > time df lost > > 3:10 310 + 32 ext2 > > 3:35 304 + 34 reiser notail > > 3:50 313 + 4 xfs > > 4:00 267 + 35 reiser > > 4:05 325 + 8 jfs > > 4:05 310 + 64 ext3 > > > So jfs and xfs lose the least space? Or do they lose space in an other > way it's quite hard to determine this with so little data. - a thing for sure is that reiserfs (without notail) is very nice for least space. - jfs seems to be have a steeper slope - ext3 has the worse initial cost (but it can be tuned i think)
