Allow me to explain adequacy.org. They pick an issue. There is the
side in favor, and the side opposed. The write a fake article that is
pretending to be from the POV of one of those extremely ignorant and
stubbornly opposed people that has no clue what they are talking about.
You know the type. Like my father and Linux. The article is very
extensive and precise in its false detailed statements. Then they plant
the fake comments that are supposed to be from the POV of one of those
people who has sorta touched on the subject in his or her lifetime.
Take in linux...someone who downloaded peanut linux five years ago, had
no idea what it was, popped into kde, and rebooted to delete it (peanut)
from the hd. Someone sorta kinda like that. Anyway, so these people
(the ones who the comments are supposed to sound like) think they know
what they're talking about. These comments of course are inherently
almost as wrong as the article itself. So it goes on, and as you can
see, those who think these articles are serious often get quite pissed off.
Yes, Mr. Borsenkow, you could say the article is a joke. Most(all) of
the comments are, too. Everyone needs to stop sh*ting in their pants
about the author who thinks "Linux Torvalds" is the sole developer of
Linux. (yes, I thought the name was a nice touch ;p).
