On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Oden Eriksson wrote: > On Tuesdayen den 30 October 2001 17.44, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 05:27:52PM +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > > > mplayer currently support mmx, mmx2, 3dnow, 3dnowex and sse > > > optimisations. Turning them all is not a good solution, and i'm not sure > > > which one one would correspond to a 'reasonable' subset: mmx + 3dnow + > > > sse ? > > > > Of course I vote for whatever optimization Athlon's have in them. MMX > > and 3dnow I think. :-) Anything else for an Athlon? > > one must ask himself what differencies/benefits/drawbacks all these options > bring, it just might be enough with mmx only?
One possiiblity: IIRC, if you do an strace of a progrma using the dynamic linker using say, libfoo, it will be checking for something like i686/mmx/libfoo, i686/libfoo first..Perhaps this can be used?
