On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:04:54AM -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> ...
> 
> The rpm has a link for /lib/cpp (to /usr/bin/cpp) even though it is
> reset using the "alternatives" hook.  If both packages used
> alternatives and at least one of them "versioned" their files
> (/usr/bin/cpp3.0 for instance) having 2.96 and 3.0 (and 2.95 once I
> build the SRPM!) installed in parallel should be "RPMable" at least.

Yes, please, if you make a gcc-2.95.rpm make it configurable with
update-alternatives and tell us how to fetch it up.
I got some sources that don't compile under gcc 2.96 and 3.02...

Thanks,

        Grégoire
________________________________________________________________
http://ulima.unil.ch/greg ICQ:16624071 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to