On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Gregoire Favre wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:04:54AM -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > ... > > > > The rpm has a link for /lib/cpp (to /usr/bin/cpp) even though it is > > reset using the "alternatives" hook. If both packages used > > alternatives and at least one of them "versioned" their files > > (/usr/bin/cpp3.0 for instance) having 2.96 and 3.0 (and 2.95 once I > > build the SRPM!) installed in parallel should be "RPMable" at least. > > Yes, please, if you make a gcc-2.95.rpm make it configurable with > update-alternatives and tell us how to fetch it up. > I got some sources that don't compile under gcc 2.96 and 3.02... > > Thanks, > gcc2.95 is still an active SRPM - we use it on PPC Stew Benedict -- MandrakeSoft OH/TN, USA http://perso.mandrakesoft.com/~sbenedict/ PPC FAQ: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/demos/PPC/FAQ/
