> > »Borsenkow Andrej« sagte am 2002-02-08 um 17:57:49 +0300 : > > I remember, many peoples complained that urpmi never cleaned up > > downloaded RPMs. Just as reminder. I cannot see easy solution that would > > please both. > > That's right, and I also complained about this. But the issue back in > the day was that urpmi would fail if a file was already in the cache. > Granted, now it doesn't fail anymore, because it purges the cache. But > what's the use of a cache if it doesn't cache anything? > > IMO, urpmi should *NOT* delete the files from the cache by itself. Never > ever.
It should delete if newer version has been downloaded. That assumes intelligent cache management. I do not say it not doable, may be everything is already there. -andrej And there should be a command that does some cleanup. > > Alexander Skwar > -- > How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to > (english) > Homepage: http://www.iso-top.de | Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen > Uptime: 3 days 0 hours 9 minutes
