On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 06:48:15PM +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Ainsi parlait Geoffrey Lee :
> [..]
> > > BTW: does it mean that PLD Linux is not so distinctive with licensing
> > > issues?
> >
> > PLD is not any different -- a license is a license. Unless they have
> > special permission, in which case probably a new license would be in force,
> > under some special provisions.
> Their package is tagged as shareware license, meaning they are effectively
> different about inclusion policy.
I wasn't talking about inclusion policy but licensing issues itself :)
- G.
