Alan Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Pixel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > camltk (tk bindings for camel) is packages as a caml subpackage, bearing ocmal > > > 3.04 version whereas its own home page http://pauillac.inria.fr/camltk claims > > > current version is 0.418. Why not create a distinct package for it ? > > > > in fact, the package ocamltk contains labltk as bundled in ocaml 3.04 > > > > i don't know what's the difference between this camltk and the labltk. > > > > It's two different bindings. Labltk is included in the ocaml > distribution, whereas camltk comes separately.
well, my question was more: is there any advantage having camltk when labeltk is bundled in Ocaml (and so may be more standard (?)) [...] > > > I also need camlimages (http://pauillac.inria.fr/camlimages) for ActiveDVI > > > (http://pauillac.inria.fr/activedvi). Has there been any previous work on > > > these ? > > > > nope. debian has it (named libcamlimages-ocaml and advi) if you want > > some inspiration :) > > There is a rpm of advi on its website (also accessible from the > freshmeat entry I created a few weeks ago). cool, an expert. May i ask a few questions? :) - how does it compare to MagicPoint? for mathematical stuff, advi must be much better. But for other things? - is there a way to generate html versions for publishing? (using hevea?) - related to the previous question, why is the manual only available in dvi... not very internet friendly!
