Alan Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Pixel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Alan Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > It's two different bindings. Labltk is included in the ocaml > > > distribution, whereas camltk comes separately. > > > > well, my question was more: is there any advantage having camltk when > > labeltk is bundled in Ocaml (and so may be more standard (?)) > > > > Well, both of them are used in some projects, so I guess that unless > these projects decide on a common library to use, both are necessary.
hum, i'm quite relunctant having both library which have the same purpose... but since ocamltk (really is labltk) is in main, there can be the other one in contrib. so, i'll rename ocamltk to ocaml-labltk (main), and someone can package ocaml-tk (contrib).
