On Saturdayen den 3 August 2002 19.33, huug wrote: > Well, pico can't be included due to licensing problems. Which is why > nano was born.
It could "Provides: pico", and also have a softlink "ln -s nano pico" I checked out "floppyfw" the other day and I think they used a "Micro Editor", u3d or something... Could that be something as it's really small and is pico/nano like? -- Regards // Oden Eriksson Deserve-IT Networks -> http://d-srv.com
