On Sun Aug 11, 2002 at 02:26:39PM -0400, Oden Eriksson wrote:

[...]
> > > Or perhaps just ignore the privsep bsd shit and continue as before?, the
> > > huge security hole is gone anyway...
> >
> > That's the problem.. you can't.  Disabling privsep doesn't remove it
> > from the code.  The introduction of privsep changed some of the
> > fundamental code in openssh; as it's been pointed out before, password
> > aging just doesn't work period in openssh right now, regardless of
> > whether privsep is enabled or not.  So, to continue on as before,
> > would be to downgrade openssh to a pre-privsep version.
> 
> Yes I just checked the code and it's pretty hard to remove it, and theo would 
> probably not approve ;)

No, Theo wouldn't approve and would end up bitching me out (again).
=)

> I also checked in their bugzilla, and there's not much regarding this privsep 
> bug at all in there from what I could tell.

There should be a whole slew, but probably listed under various
problems with pam.  This is definately a known issue.  Once I have a
little extra time, I will start fiddling with the cvs version of
openssh and see if they are actually fixing this stuff. 

-- 
MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/
"lynx -source http://www.freezer-burn.org/bios/vdanen.gpg | gpg --import"
{GnuPG: 1024D/FE6F2AFD : 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7  66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}

Attachment: msg70248/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to