On Wednesday 28 August 2002 07:26 am, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 12:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Has anyone contacted the developer of the algorithm in question?? If > > not, this is all shooting in the dark. I wanna know if Mandrake has > > contacted this Frauenwhoever to ask if "Free" decoding software is > > indeed excluded from possible litigation??. If it is, then this thread > > is a waste of time. > > Heh - I just noticed it's out very own Gotz Washck who posted this to > slashdot in the first place :). Maybe he can clarify. Why do you post > this now when, as I mentioned, archive.org seems to show the terms > changed in August last year? Is it wrong? > > And Jason, PLEASE DON'T SET A REPLY-TO HEADER WHEN POSTING TO THIS LIST! Why isn't the list simply configured to re-write the header? Couldn't it just include both the stuff in the original reply-to and the cooker email?
This mailing list server is not very good. -- -- Igor
