Combelles, Christophe (MED, ALTEN) wrote:
>>
>> Don't expect mdk to rape KDE like Redhat did, at least I hope not. I
don't think spending time theming is important. KDE 3.1 is themed very
nicely with beautiful icons and keramik theme already, I'd rather see
mandrake continue to focus on bringing quality, stable and
complete/compatible apps and libs.
>>
>>
>
> Maybe kde and gnome should at least have two or three themes in
common, to be able to have a minimum unified look if wanted.
>
>
>
>
ay! I second that, making a unified theme does not rape anything, you
still have the possibility to don't use it, as with mandrake's menu's,
alot of people seem to criticize these(eg. mosfet*grmbl*), but you have
the CHOICE to disable these features, and as far as I know you don't
have to use the bluecurve stuff in RH. I don't think people should start
bashing other people just for doing something different when you still
have the choice to revert back, this reminds me of those who thinks that
mandrake = windows because you have all the gui's available, but *noone*
forces you to use them, nor install them...
So I think it's a good idea to add things like this, as long as you have
the possibility to revert back.
- [Cooker] 9.1 Yura Gusev
- Re: [Cooker] 9.1 Jason Straight
- Re: [Cooker] 9.1 Combelles, Christophe (MED, ALTEN)
- Re: [Cooker] 9.1 Per Øyvind Karlsen
- Re: [Cooker] 9.1 Yura Gusev
- Re: [Cooker] 9.1 Vox
- Re: [Cooker] 9.1 Yura Gusev
- Re: [Cooker] 9.1 Austin Acton
- Re: [Cooker] 9.1 Igor Izyumin
- Re: [Cooker] 9.1 Guillaume Cottenceau