Re: [Cooker] OSNews Review

[David Walluck]

Vox wrote:

This time Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> becomes daring and writes:

David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Even still, rpmdrake should work without a mouse. It does not.

Why? Rpmdrake without a mouse is not at all a priority. Damn, why
don't people setup a mouse for GUI's, or use urpmi if they don't
want a GUI? I don't get it.

If you have no mouse or the mouse wheel goes crazy, you won' be
able to get past the install packages stage.

I have to confess I didn't even test rpmdrake without a mouse,
this tells pretty well the important I stick to it :).

  I'm thinking he means hardrake and not rpmdrake...the installer is
  where the mouse-goes-crazy thing happens sometimes.

I meant rpmdrake. Yes, harddrake mouse detection might be where it initially happens, but the net effect is that one is unable to continue with the installation.

And if the thread was followed, I *was* using the mouse but it stopped working during the installation.


--
Sincerely,

David Walluck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

msg79377/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature