Le Mercredi 13 Novembre 2002 23:22, Gwenole Beauchesne a écrit : > Hi, > > > How do you deal with this type of files, all are packaged under %doc, > > but > > rpm-build failed: (actually I `rm` it in spec) > > rm it from where? Under $RPM_BUILD_ROOT? Then that's normal, %doc file > is not meant to have file "installed" under $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. > > So, if you have in your build dir, saysNEWS, simply %doc NEWS, don't > install it. This behavior hasn't changed.
I retranslate my question: %make install install this files on $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/doc, but better place is in %doc (wich have %version-%release), before latest update of rpm, all files in /usr/share/doc was not list in %files section, but we had %doc doc/*. But this is not possible because building failed now. I want just confirmation about the better way to build without including this files. Bye, thanks for this quick answer ;) -- Linux pour Mac !? Enfin le moyen de transformer une pomme en véritable ordinateur. - JL. Olivier Thauvin - http://nanardon.homelinux.org/