On 14 Nov 2002 at 16:19, Mark Scott wrote: > I found that removing -nostdlib from my library link options solved the > problem (not fully tested them so there may be other gremlims lurking > from removal of -nostdlib).
I don't remember having that option for linker. So in my case this is not an option. > On some libraries I could get away with just removing an unnecessary > inclusion of <iostream> from the source, removing the need for the > library to want __dso_handle. This might be why the simple libraries load. Hmm.. If iostream is causing problem, then I can have a relook at code and remove it if not required. But that is workaround at the best and not a solution. I can not ask people not to use iostream in their library just because my server application won't tolerate that.. Besides I tried linking /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 to /usr/lib/libstdc++.so. No luck.. Do you think rebuilidng libstdc++ would help? What option do I need to tweak.. Bye Shridhar -- Wit, n.: The salt with which the American Humorist spoils his cookery ... by leaving it out. -- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
