On Sunday 01 December 2002 03:12 am, Buchan Milne wrote: > On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Mike Graham wrote: > > On Saturday 30 November 2002 06:00 pm, Adam Williamson wrote: > > The RPM for pornview is already on Texstars website Pclinuxonline.com > > Tex (unlike almost all other contributors and builders of RPMS) doesn't > cooperate with any other projects, he duplicates work, doesn't follow > naming conventions (kdemoreartwork- for example), and mixes packages with > vastly different licenses in the same place. > > So Tex's stuff doesn't really count.
I'm not a contributor for Cooker, Cooker Contribs or Mandrake Club. There are more than enough people who do that. I provide updated apps and unique things for MDK 9.0. I build rpms for myself and share them with others. So you are right, my stuff doesn't really count here but it does with the users of mdk 9.0. > > I actually had a package before Tex did, but hesitated to put my name on > it ... so didn't add it to PLF. I don't think it belongs in the distro. > Assuming we roll out more linux desktops, I don't think this package > (mostly due to the name and icon/logo) would belong on our work machines, > and I suspect it might even be grounds for sexual harassment complaints. > > If there is a place for it, it would be PLF. > > Buchan uh right Ranger, unless you packaged pornview 0.1.0 within 30 minutes after it was announced on freshmeat then no you didnt package it before me. But it doesn't matter since my stuff doesn't count.
