Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Le Lundi 2 Décembre 2002 19:18, Han Boetes a écrit : > > [~/src/RPM]% make lint > > ==> srpm > > E: aspell-nl configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run > > without specifying the libdir. Configure options must be > > augmented with something like libdir=%{_libdir}. > > > > Would be irrelevant cause the makefile doesn't support it. I mean I > > can add it but that would be silly. > > > > ==> rpm > > E: aspell-nl only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary > > files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. > > > > Yeah that's aspell. That's not for me to decide. > > What about exception in rpmlint (as for suid binaries), or specific > comments in spec files for disabling those errors ?
Hmmm rpmlint is a great tool for quickly finding bugs but just as often it makes mistakes. But if I read those mistakes I know that it's a logical mistake and I don't care anymore. I just pasted them to let the other developpers know I paid attention to them. I am quite used to filtering the interesting errors from silly ones. I hope other people have that wisdom as well :) //Han -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software