Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Le Lundi 2 Décembre 2002 19:18, Han Boetes a écrit :
> > [~/src/RPM]% make lint
> > ==> srpm
> > E: aspell-nl configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run
> >    without specifying the libdir. Configure options must be
> >    augmented with something like libdir=%{_libdir}.
> >
> > Would be irrelevant cause the makefile doesn't support it. I mean I
> > can add it but that would be silly.
> >
> > ==> rpm
> > E: aspell-nl only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary
> >    files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
> >
> > Yeah that's aspell. That's not for me to decide.
>
> What about exception in rpmlint (as for suid binaries), or specific
> comments in spec files for disabling those errors ?

Hmmm rpmlint is a great tool for quickly finding bugs but just as often
it makes mistakes. But if I read those mistakes I know that it's a
logical mistake and I don't care anymore. I just pasted them to let the
other developpers know I paid attention to them.
I am quite used to filtering the interesting errors from silly ones. I
hope other people have that wisdom as well :)



//Han
-- 
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software


Reply via email to