söndagen den 26 januari 2003 19.08 skrev Brian J. Murrell: > On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 09:01:40AM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote: > > [Contrib-RPM] > > > > --=-=-= > > Name : amanda Relocations: (not > > relocateable) Version : 2.4.3 Vendor: > > MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk Build Date: Sun > > Jan 26 06:08:09 2003 > > ... > > > * Sun Jan 26 2003 Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.4.3-1mdk > > > > - 2.4.3 > > - bzip all sources > > - use P0 from RH > > - remove installed files > > - add installed files > > - fix no-prereq-on rpm-helper > > - built without gdbm (use flatfile db) > > - misc spec file fixes > > It would be nice if the changelog reflected the lack of the append > patch that was in previous releases. This is something somebody > should be able to determine by looking at the changelog prior to > upgrading their installation.
Oops, I forgot to mention that in the changelog > > --=-=-= > > W: amanda patch-not-applied Patch1: amanda-2.4.2p2-append-patch.bz2 > > ... > > > @@ -105,50 +100,58 @@ > > %prep > > %setup -q > > %patch0 -p1 -b .bug18322 > > -%patch1 -p1 -b .append > > + > > +# re-apply this one when the patch is updated, > > +# there's too many rejects as is. > > +#%patch1 -p1 -b .append > > Does this version apply any cleaner? > > http://www-internal.alphanet.ch/archives/local/alphanet/divers/patches/aman >da/PATCHES/2/amanda-2.4.2p2-cril-append-patch.gz No, 12 rejects with pretty huge and complex chunks. To manually apply this would require many hours of work, and I think the result would be questionable. There's always a possibility to roll back to the previous packages? Yesterday I checked which packages was not rebuilt against latest requires and buildrequires, and I picked the most usefull ones to rebuild and optionally update the software versions. I could keep my hands off, but I only wanted to help out. -- Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT.com
