söndagen den 26 januari 2003 19.58 skrev Buchan Milne: > > No, 12 rejects with pretty huge and complex chunks. To manually apply > > this would require many hours of work, and I think the result would be > > questionable. There's always a possibility to roll back to the previous > > packages? Yesterday I checked which packages was not rebuilt against > > latest requires and buildrequires, and I picked the most usefull ones to > > rebuild and optionally update the software versions. I could keep my > > hands off, but I only wanted to help out. > > It was still on my to-do list, but we just migrated our main file server > and it's 110GB of data from to a new server, and was not prepared to mess > with new versions of amanda while we had only one current on-disk copy of > the data, on a single 120GB IDE disk. Migration finished last week, so I > will take a look at amanda again and try and track down a newer version of > the patch.
Cool. Sorry if I caused any problems. > Then again, I also want to take a look at Bacula, which has these features > natively and a native windows agent. Looks good, gotta try it when I get some spare time. -- Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT.com
