On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 20:58, Gerard Patel wrote:
> At 08:37 PM 1/27/03 +0000, you (Adam Williamson) wrote:
> 
> >Well, don't urpmi gaim, cos Mandrake's still using 0.59, and CVS is way
> >better (0.60) =). You're still sort of right as regards 0.60, though -
> >it does use a fixed size preferences window. Which is odd, because I was
> >referring to the contact list, which *does* dynamically include or
> >remove scrollbars (for instance, with just a few people logged on my
> >contact list has no scrollbars, but if a bunch more log on and they no
> >longer fit in the window, I get a vertical scrollbar).
> 
> A list is another story; a list is completely useless without scrolling
> so it _has_ to be implemented anyway, even if your screen is
> an Ibm T221. Some Mandrake tools have scrollbars too to handle
> lists, like drakservices for example.

Well, yes, and drakconf etc. are currently "completely useless" to those
of us with low resolution screens. For the same reason. Sure it's a
smaller set, but so what? Microsoft can get away with endlessly upping
hardware requirements and pandering to a bare majority, Linux vendors
can't...
-- 
adamw


Reply via email to