fredagen den 7 februari 2003 12.01 skrev Warly:
> Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > This is a dumb way to do things.  If it can't go into etcskel, then
> >> > each Maildir aware application should attempt to make the entry to
> >> > /etc/skel.
> >> >
> >> > Actually, if postfix did this, it would be enough.  Chances are, if
> >> > someone is going to use something Maildir-aware, they will either a)
> >> > install postfix or b) install no MTA (to install qmail later, for
> >> > example).  So postfix would likely be installed before any users are
> >> > added.
> >> >
> >> > Having this in contribs is just an extra package people won't think to
> >> > install, and one additional dependency.
> >>
> >> I'm tired of debating this. I presented a simple workaround to ease
> >> future strain on the support department. No one at MandrakeSoft will
> >> ever fix this permantly, it's a totally ignored issue. I thought you, of
> >> all would understand the purpose of this package, I must have been
> >> mistaking.
> >
> > as for me i'm still waiting for an answer:
> >
> > http://archives.mandrakelinux.com/cooker/2003-01/msg04580.php
>
> I agree with Pixel, there is no need in creating those directories. The
> delivering program should, and have to be fixed accordingly. The aim
> of etcskel is not to fix broken programs, but to give basic necessary
> structure for a user to log in.
>
> So, what need to be done, is to fix programs that rely on those
> directories. We need to do things in a clear way, or the distro will
> just become a amount of workarrounds of other broken workarrounds.

Be my guest: http://www.commedia.it/ccontavalli/#courier

-- 
Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT.com

Reply via email to