On Tuesday 11 February 2003 07:49, Oden Eriksson wrote: > http://ivam.sourceforge.net/ > http://gvbox.sourceforge.net/ > > Cool. > > Still VOCD seems more appealing and maintained. >
Yes but for modem use. An isdn-backend would be cool for this. And it misses some capabilities ISDN has but Modem not. I for myself think linux needs a unified server/client solution for this. A network aware server with backends (fax, voice, other things) that hides the actual device and only show the abilities. and frontends (X, cli, http). The pro of that would be a unified interface for programming applications and you can have the server on one computer and the UserInterface on another. I think that would fit in a lot home-networks and if it is done right even in enterprise solutions. The contra is, no one has implemented such a thing. > > I don't know what will fit your needs. I have a passive AVM-isdncard with > > the closed source driver, using hylafax + capi4hylafax and vbox as > > answering machine here at home. caiviar would be interesting to hack some > > perl ;-). > > > > Then there is a hybrid card the sedlbaur speedfax, which is a passive > > isdn-card with a sort of 14400 Faxmodem onboard, this card is supported > > by isdn4linux. > > > > Further there is a solution for fax based on capi4hylafax, hylafax, ldap > > for enterprise fax solutions. > > Very cool! Thanks so much for your input, I will evaluate as much as I can > about this. If you need further infos I try to help as far as I can. If you look at ebay, I would ask on de.comp.os.unix.linux.isdn how much they differe and which one you schuld choose.(its a german/english newsgroup). -- Regards Steffen ____________________ counter.li.org : #296567. machine: 181800 vdr-box : 87 ____________________ Please dont CC me, since if I have replied I'll watch the tread. Both mails will be filtered to the ML-folder. Thanks
