Le Samedi 22 Février 2003 13:04, Murray J. Root a écrit :
> > > Everybody, please give up insisting on this point. The KDE dependency
> > > has been argued here for many times in cooker. People come and go,
> > > argueing over and over on this topic, without achieving anything. If
> > > the time is spent on doing other things, cooker could have become a
> > > little better. So please spend your energy on something you CAN do, and
> > > kill this thread. Is it OK for everybody?
> >
> > No, I don't have the room for kdebase. It's too much wasted space.
>
> You're beating a dead horse. These people have no clue what "requires"
> means and apply it to whatever whim they have the day they make a package.
> Let it drop - you can't win against people who won't read your messages.
Is it possible to have a discussion about KDE without people insulting or
ignoring each others ? So far what has been achieved is a totally absurd
situation where cooker community complains endlessly, while Mdk KDE team
prefers to work underground with meaningless changelog to avoid answering any
questions... Where is collaborative work there ?
For KDE team defense, i'd like to remember than complaining is easy, while
fixing is much harder. And sofar, i've not seen much patches submitted to
them, far less patches rejected. My libqt3 spec patch for instance has been
accepted without discussion. So complaining people, please provide patches.
And if they ever get refused, there is still place in PLF for alternative KDE
packages.
--
If such a program has not crashed yet, it is waiting for a critical moment
before it crashes.
-- Murphy's Computer Laws n°6
