On Friday 07 March 2003 17:00, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 20:43, jokerman64 wrote: > > I don't think the package is essential but I in no way think that it > > should be left out. I was pretty pissed the last time the screensavers > > were left out and don't want to see this happening again. For those of > > you who don't think the screensavers are essential then and shoudn't be > > added by that logic lm_sensors shouldn't be added either. What's more it > > takes too much time to even get it working properly. At least with the > > screensavers it's click and go. And don't get me started on crap like > > 7colors. who the hell even plays that game. > > Did you even READ the context of that comment?! Someone said to split > the package into artwork and artwork-essential. I pointed out that none > of it was essential. That particular point had nothing to do with > whether it went in or not.
Nothing in life is really essential and i wouldn't use the word essential for a screensaver but a screensaver is needed.
