On 10-04-2024 14:42, Desiree Miloshevic wrote:
...
Also here’s an interesting link to the last months’ ruling article.
https://www.globalnorm.de/en/news-product-compliance/details/eu-malamud-case-and-cjeu-ruling-on-march-5-2024/
It raises questions regarding to the European standardisation process.
Intereesting indeed.
The actual judgement can be found at:
https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=2D421F4D58FCC1F3053AC53F626FD995?text=&docid=283443&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=1178057
To me, a non-legally-trained person, this looks like a square win and
will be a
significant step to make EU standards freely available if they are in
some way legally binding. I have little sympathy with the
standardisation organisations having to organise their funding in a
different manner than by selling the product of the experts that produce
their standards. There are working examples like the IETF.
It is kind of embarassing that it takes our good friend Carl Malamud to
move this forward from the US where he has achieved similar things.
Carl has been a regular participant in RIPE in the 1990s. He spent some
time in Amsterdam working on the "1996 Internet World Fair" after
publising "Exploring the Internet"
https://archive.org/details/exploringinterne00mala . Look those up for
some educational entertainment.
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your
subscription options, please visit:
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/cooperation-wg
