On 06/06/18 17:27, Marcin Wojdyr wrote:
>> After installing a few libraries with `sudo dnf whatprovides missinglib` got
>> coot working. But it does not feel the same as ccp4's coot. It feels a
>> little bit slow.
> It's generally the same, but CCP4 applies a few patches to the coot
> source, uses different compiler and compilation options, different
> versions of dependencies (as you've seen coot depends on a huge number
> of third-party libraries), etc.
>
> You may try building coot in the same way as it is build by CCP4:
>
> first install bzr and then:
>
> bzr checkout bzr+http://oisin.rc-harwell.ac.uk/bzr/series-70/trunk devtools
> cd devtools
> export FLAGS="-O3 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mtune=core2"
> export LDFLAGS="-s -Wl,--build-id=sha1"
> ./cj build coot
> misc/linux-rpath.sh ./install
>

Thanks Marcin,

So the difference is:
My coot build: -O
CCP4 coot build: -O3 -mtune=core2

(I use -O3 for my/internal builds, but not the distributed ones)

Paul.

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the COOT list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=COOT&A=1

Reply via email to