On Thu, 08 Jun 2023 21:37:09 +0200, Ondřej Budai wrote: > RPM Sequoia's crypto policies can be configured, so you should be able to > re-enable SHA-1. However, this would > be a global change, not only for EL6... See > https://docs.rs/sequoia-policy-config/latest/sequoia_policy_config/#hash-functions > ... > On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 5:42 PM Pavel Raiskup <prais...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hello maintainers! > > Copr builders have been updated to Fedora 38 today (some old builders > might still be running F37 ATM, but when they finish the task(s) they > work on, they will be deleted). Our testsuite is passing just fine, so > you _should_ be fine too :-). Please let us know if you have some > troubles. > > There was one important change in Fedora 38 - RPM switched to the > Sequoia crypto backend. It refuses SHA-1 in crypto; which basically > disallows Mock to properly check EL6 GPG signatures. To allow further > builds, we switched to gpgcheck=0 for all epel-6 chroots. If you know a > better work-around, let me know.
I find this behavior surprising. The default policy as set by fedora-crypto-policies is for rpm-sequoia is to accept SHA-1 (and DSA-1024, ...): https://gitlab.com/redhat-crypto/fedora-crypto-policies/-/blob/master/policies/FEDORA38.pol#L75 What policy are you using? Neal _______________________________________________ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
