[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12592621#action_12592621
]
Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-3307:
--------------------------------------
> the assumption that the protocol is hdfs
No, the nested URI scheme is appended to the front of the host. A KFS archive
would be:
har://kfs-host:port/dir/foo.har/a/b
which would name the file /a/b within the archive kfs://host:port/dir/foo.har.
> if done right - one should be able to support any archive format no?
That's a different goal. Most archive formats are not Hadoop friendly. The
goal here is to develop a Hadoop-friendly archive format.
> Archives in Hadoop.
> -------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-3307
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3307
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: fs
> Reporter: Mahadev konar
> Assignee: Mahadev konar
> Fix For: 0.18.0
>
>
> This is a new feature for archiving and unarchiving files in HDFS.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
