[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12634452#action_12634452
]
Hemanth Yamijala commented on HADOOP-4053:
------------------------------------------
bq. 1. I'd expect jobCompleted() to be a no-op, and have jobRemoved() get
called when the job is removed.
I can only speak from the {{CapacityTaskScheduler}}'s perspective. It cares
about jobCompleted, and doesn't care about jobRemoved. Actually, I would have
thought jobCompleted is the more important event for a scheduler. While the
number of implementations is still small (only four right now), I would still
advocate an abstract method and leave the schedulers to actually deal with the
implementation.
> Schedulers need to know when a job has completed
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-4053
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4053
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.19.0
> Reporter: Vivek Ratan
> Assignee: Amar Kamat
> Fix For: 0.19.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-4053-v1.patch
>
>
> The JobInProgressListener interface is used by the framework to notify
> Schedulers of when jobs are added, removed, or updated. Right now, there is
> no way for the Scheduler to know that a job has completed. jobRemoved() is
> called when a job is retired, which can happen many hours after a job is
> actually completed. jobUpdated() is called when a job's priority is changed.
> We need to notify a listener when a job has completed (either successfully,
> or has failed or been killed).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.