On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 08:25, Andrew Haley<a...@redhat.com> wrote: > Andrew John Hughes wrote: > >> FWIW, I'm pretty sure I'm not alone in saying I'd much prefer to >> receive these 'uninteresting' mails. > > This particular back-port mail would have been very interesting to > us, since it has a huge impact on build times on some architectures.
The mercurial history of openjdk6 is sadly incomplete, even when compared to openjdk7. But going forward, we have hg in place, and anyone who is managing a downstream release probably should be examining recent changesets anyways. Humans are flaky; hg is going to be a more reliable source of what's gone in. Martin
