On Dec 4 2012, at 22:10 , David Holmes wrote: > Hi Mike, > > In multiple places: > > + * <p/>xxx ... > > Should that be <p> tag? Is it actually needed? (my javadoc is a bit rusty).
Many of these were added/changed by NetBeans styler. I then added additional instances. I have converted all of the <p/> -> <p>. I have also filed a bug against NetBans styler: http://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223342 > Aside: I don't realise you could {@inheritDoc) as a simple text insertion > mechanism. I only learned of this in the last six months myself. :-) > Just to be clear, the null-handling statements are intended to be normative > and apply to anyone who might provide an implementation of theses classes - > right? Correct. I would prefer that they were not but it seems unavoidable. Mike > > Thanks, > David > > On 5/12/2012 3:47 PM, Mike Duigou wrote: >> Hello all; >> >> I have updated the proposed patch. The changes primarily add class and >> method documentation regarding handling of null for the primitive >> specializations. >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/8004015/1/webrev/ >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/8004015/1/specdiff/java/util/function/package-summary.html >> >> I've also reformatted the source for the default methods. >> >> Mike >> >> >> On Nov 26 2012, at 18:12 , Mike Duigou wrote: >> >>> Hello all; >>> >>> In the original patch which added the basic lambda functional interfaces, >>> CR#8001634 [1], none of the interfaces extended other interfaces. The >>> reason was primarily that the javac compiler did not, at the time that >>> 8001634 was proposed, support extension methods. The compiler now supports >>> adding of method defaults so this patch improves the functional interfaces >>> by filing in the inheritance hierarchy. >>> >>> Adding the parent interfaces and default methods allows each functional >>> interface to be used in more places. It is especially important for the >>> functional interfaces which support primitive types, IntSupplier, >>> IntFunction, IntUnaryOperator, IntBinaryOperator, etc. We expect that >>> eventually standard implementations of these interfaces will be provided >>> for functions like max, min, sum, etc. By extending the reference oriented >>> functional interfaces such as Function, the primitive implementations can >>> be used with the boxed primitive types along with the primitive types for >>> which they are defined. >>> >>> The patch to add parent interfaces and default methods can be found here: >>> >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/8004015/0/webrev/ >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/8004015/0/specdiff/java/util/function/package-summary.html >>> >>> Mike >>> >>> [1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/c2e80176a697 >>
