On 14/01/2013 18:20, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Ooooooh.... this change goes beyond my review capability!!! I thought
we were just eliminating the indirection of ThreadLocal, anyway...
As a basic review I don't see anything obviously wrong, and I don't
have a problem with adding the fields to j.l.Thread, but I'm not in a
position to review in detail the algorithm used.
Alan, did mention that he may be in a better position to do a detailed
review. I can also sponsor this change.
I looked at the changes and they look good to me. The additional fields
of java.lang.Thread shouldn't be an issue.
The other thing I notice is that the serialized form of the original
ThreadLocalRandom included the padding fields, I guess they should have
been transient in the original implementation.
-Alan.
