Thanks, Martin, We've all heard of code "smells" -- I hereby dub this a code "chuckle" :-)
The change looks good to me otherwise as well. Thanks, Jim On 03/28/2013 12:05 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
I took Laurent's suggestion of renaming count to c, even though the result looks like a value judgement on a competing programming environment: value[c++] = 'n'; value[c++] = 'u'; value[c++] = 'l'; value[c++] = 'l'; On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Laurent Bourgès <[email protected]wrote: Maybe the local var count could be renamed _count or c to avoid name conflict with the member count and make the code more readable / obvious.
-- Jim Gish | Consulting Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.0304 Oracle Java Platform Group | Core Libraries Team 35 Network Drive Burlington, MA 01803 [email protected]
