On 9/05/2013 7:47 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 05/09/2013 10:45 AM, David Holmes wrote:
....
Good point Mike. I guess the same argument could be made for putting
any value in the implementation detail. Any objection to completely
removing any reference to this?
The compile-time constant issue is easily fixed by using an
initialization function.
I think it is important for users to know what the sequential sorting
threshold is.
I don't understand why this is important. Is the general advise not,
always use parallelSort unless there is a good reason not to?
That certainly would NOT be my general advise. My general advise is only
use parallelism to solve a performance problem. Overuse of FJ for non
critical tasks will just cause contention and an overall loss of
performance at the system level.
David
-----
-Chris
David
-----
-Chris
Mike
